Do not treat the 2017 forms as standard boilerplate. Treat them as a procedural operating system . If your client cannot afford a full-time claims administrator to manage the 28-day notice cycles, use the 1999 form or the Short Form Contract.
This is a significant change from the 1999 editions, which only required a "fair" determination, and a marked departure from the 1987 book, which expressly required impartiality. While the 2017 version does not define "neutrality," industry practice and scholarly commentary suggest it includes:
This guide provides a comprehensive legal and practical analysis of the FIDIC 2017 Suite, highlighting the critical structural changes, risk allocations, and claims procedures that define modern project execution. fidic 2017 a practical legal guide pdf
The 2017 Books are roughly 50% longer than the 1999 versions, with most provisions having been substantially re-drafted. Despite the increase in length, FIDIC's standard approach to clause names and numbering is largely unaltered, which can cause confusion between the two editions.
If a party fails to comply with a binding DAAB decision, the other party can immediately refer that failure directly to ICC Arbitration under Sub-Clause 21.6. This bypasses the need for a fresh Engineer determination, providing a fast track to enforcement. 4. Risk Allocation: Red, Yellow, and Silver Book Variations Do not treat the 2017 forms as standard boilerplate
Navigating the FIDIC 2017 Suite: A Practical Legal Guide The 2017 FIDIC (Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseils) Suite of Contracts represents a major shift in international construction law. Updating the classic 1999 Editions, the 2017 Red, Yellow, and Silver books introduced increased prescription, stricter dispute management, and greater risk clarity.
The Engineer has a positive obligation to encourage agreement or make a fair determination within set time limits. Clause 4.12 (Unforeseeable Physical Conditions): This is a significant change from the 1999
When searching for or creating the ultimate FIDIC 2017 resource, ensure it includes detailed analysis of the following three pillars of the 2017 changes.
If you need a breakdown of a specific clause like ? Share public link
This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later.
A major loophole in the 1999 edition was the difficulty in enforcing a DAB decision if one party gave a timely Notice of Dissatisfaction (NOD). Under Sub-Clause 21.4.3, DAAB decisions are immediately binding on both parties. If a party fails to comply with a DAAB decision, the other party can immediately refer that failure directly to arbitration under Sub-Clause 21.6, bypass further administrative steps, and seek an expedited summary award. 5. Practical Drafting and Negotiation Tips